Students were invited to choose an artefact from several artefacts introduced and discussed in a two hour seminar held in the Fryer library, hosted by the course convenor in conjunction with Fryer library staff and Emeritus Prof Gillian Whitlock. Students were advised to plan and structure their reflective essays in the following way: (i) report, (ii) relate and (iii) reason. This involves reporting on the artefact(s) chosen, conveying which artefact was chosen to inspire the reflective paper, to summarise what the artefact conveyed and why it was chosen; (ii) relating the artefact to wider socio-legal knowledge and understanding informed by prescribed reading (from earlier in the course) about offshore processing and human rights; and (iii) reasoning, by explaining why the artefact was important in enhancing and enriching the student's learning - their knowledge, understanding and appreciation of offshore processing and its human impacts.