SCIE1000 covers mathematics, computer programming, communication, science and modelling. The main goal is to help students see that similar tools and approaches can be applied in a wide range of discipline areas and contexts. So my goal was mostly to develop students’ abilities and confidence in transferring knowledge from one context to another context that may initially appear to be quite distinct, but in reality the same general approaches apply. This is important in this course because we teach students from all areas of science. Rather than “freezing” when they encounter something unfamiliar, we want them to “know where to start” and to be able to apply the techniques that they know. I also want them to appreciate that understanding exactly why a particular approach or model works can help them understand a context in their own discipline area. This is a counterpoint to a common approach of saying “you need to contextualise the learning to engage students when learning generic techniques”… my counterpoint is that understanding at a deeper level why a standard technique works can help a student assimilate an unfamiliar context. For example, understanding truly what is meant by an area under a mathematical curve can help students understand contexts from finance, pharmacology, ecology and so on. During semester, we cover a number of context areas. The final exam is always based on a particular context that the students have never encountered. All questions are stated within this context, and students will often need to communicate an interpretation of their answers. The contexts are all genuine, using real data from real research or government publications. So we are not just examining students’ mathematics or modelling or programming abilities, but even more so, their ability to transfer skills to something unfamiliar. I have uploaded a few past exam papers. Course content did not change significantly over that time period