Students are presented with a list of texts that relate (to greater or lesser extents) to salient themes covered throughout the course, from which they must select a text to write a creative book review . In SOCY2220 these have included a combination of applied academic and empirical works, as well as opinionative or narrative publications from scholars of popular culture. The 1000 word review could contain commentary on a variety of elements, including an overview of key themes discussed in the book (and their significance to the course content and/or discipline); the style and purpose of the book; its strengths and weaknesses; and intended audience/s or recommend readership. Overall, students should aim to reflect on the effectiveness of different forms of writing in engaging complex theories and ideas. This applied task also encourages active learning by presenting students with a somewhat unfamiliar stimulus to which they need to creatively respond. Source texts can vary (or may even include multi-modal options, similar to the Film Critique task employed in Peter Walters' delivery of SOCY1050), but should be able to be easily read in the duration of the course, so as to allow for optimal use of the teaching and learning p review . In SOCY2220 these have included a combination of applied academic and empirical works, as well as opinionative or narrative publications from scholars of popular culture. The 1000 word review could contain commentary on a variety of elements, including an overview of key themes discussed in the book (and their significance to the course content and/or discipline); the style and purpose of the book; its strengths and weaknesses; and intended audience/s or recommend readership. Overall, students should aim to reflect on the effectiveness of different forms of writing in engaging complex theories and ideas. This applied task also encourages active learning by presenting students with a somewhat unfamiliar stimulus to which they need to creatively respond. Source texts can vary (or may even include multi-modal options, similar to the Film Critique task employed in Peter Walters' delivery of SOCY1050), but should be able to be easily read in the duration of the course, so as to allow for optimal use of the teaching and learning period.

PLEASE NOTE: The academic integrity information displayed on this page is currently under review. Some examples and descriptions were developed before the widespread availability of generative AI tools and may not reflect current approaches to assessment security. When adapting an assessment idea, staff should consider how the design supports authorship, verifies student achievement of learning outcomes, and mitigates inappropriate use of AI and other forms of academic misconduct.

Details

CLASS SIZE
60-80
YEAR LEVEL
First year, Second year
ASSESSMENT SECURITY
Open
SUPERVISION STATUS
Not supervised
SUBMISSION MEDIUM
Text
ASSESSMENT DELIVERY MODE
Digital task
AUTHENTICITY CONTEXT
Reflective / Professional identity, Research‑based / Inquiry / Problem-based
TAGS
review