Advantages
Enhances potential employability by inviting students into contemporary professional practices. Hones in-depth industry knowledge through an applied task, whilst encouraging strategic and constructive communication. Transfers easily to any discipline in which a peer review process is a part of professional practice (as is the case in all HaSS disciplines).
Challenges
Some students may struggle with critiquing the works of an established professional. This can be addressed by including learning activities throughout the course in which students constructively critique each other's work (with emphasis being placed on delivering critical appraisal).
Tips for implementation
Care should be taken to source a manuscript from an individual who will be receptive to critiques that may require refining or lack subtlety. If the course coordinator has drafts in progress they may wish to use their own material.
How it supports academic integrity
Students respond to an unpublished, original and contemporary manuscript, hence the likelihood of plagiarism is markedly reduced. To adequately complete the task students also need to actively participate in formative class exercises, in which staff can observe any discrepancies in students' in-class work as compared to a final report (as a means of identifying outsourced material).