Designed to encourage creativity and to foster a dynamic learning environment, this assessment sees students conduct an object analysis, drawing on a theorist of course relevance (in the case of LTCS3001, students choose one of 6 French theorist whose work is discussed in the course). Students choose an object, practice, or phenomena (for example a film, a building, a dance) and discuss this in relation to the theoretical perspective of their chosen theorist. The assessable output of this assessment is an A2 poster. Students must also effectively speak to aspects of their analysis during an exhibition style Q&A during designated class time in which students and staff circulate around the teaching space and in groups; students are divided into two or three groups and swap between addressing their own posters and examining others. This process creates dynamism and opportunities for peer learning. In addition to the quality of the textual and visuals aspects of their posters, students are also marked on their ability to demonstrate an in-depth knowledge of their chosen theorists and their subsequent analysis throughout their oral responses. Students are encouraged to ask questions about the posters that are of most interest analysis, drawing on a theorist of course relevance (in the case of LTCS3001, students choose one of 6 French theorist whose work is discussed in the course). Students choose an object, practice, or phenomena (for example a film, a building, a dance) and discuss this in relation to the theoretical perspective of their chosen theorist. The assessable output of this assessment is an A2 poster. Students must also effectively speak to aspects of their analysis during an exhibition style Q&A during designated class time in which students and staff circulate around the teaching space and in groups; students are divided into two or three groups and swap between addressing their own posters and examining others. This process creates dynamism and opportunities for peer learning. In addition to the quality of the textual and visuals aspects of their posters, students are also marked on their ability to demonstrate an in-depth knowledge of their chosen theorists and their subsequent analysis throughout their oral responses. Students are encouraged to ask questions about the posters that are of most interest to them.

Details

CLASS SIZE
20-40
CLASS LEVEL
Third year
ASSESSMENT SECURITY
Medium security
TIME REQUIREMENTS
Medium time
GRADUATE ATTRIBUTES
Effective communication skills, Independence and creativity
CONDITIONS
Peer-assessed, Sequence
TAGS
presentation
Photo of Dr Juliana De Nooy

Dr Juliana De Nooy

j.denooy@uq.edu.au

Dr Juliana DE NOOY's research interests include intercultural narratives and travel literature (esp. Australia/France); intercultural communication (esp. intercultural pragmatics and ICC pedagogy); computer-mediated communication (esp. intercultural); twins and doubles in contemporary literature and culture; theories of identity and difference.



Juliana completed a doctorate in literary theory at the Université de Paris 7 (Jussieu). She taught at the Université de Paris 10 (Nanterre) and the Université de Technologie de Compiègne before returning to the University of Queensland where she is a Senior Lecturer in French. She has published books on Derrida and Kristeva (1998), on twins in contemporary literature and film (2005) and on intercultural communication on Internet discussion sites (with Barbara Hanna, 2009). Her current project investigates memoirs by Australians living in France. Find out more