Based on a pedagogical strategy that approaches writing as synonymous with thinking (rather than just the end product of thought), this assessment requires students to produce a clear, well-considered argument in the form of a short essay . Students are assessed on the structure and coherence of their argument, analytic capabilities, and written communication. This assessment is designed to make explicit those essential skills for developing a clear and persuasive argument and to develop foundational thinking and writing skills (both key outcomes from undergraduate study). This technique is well suited to introductory and gateway courses, having been recently used in PHIL1110 (an intensive mode course for high school students in UQ's Enhanced Studies Program). In contrast to more traditional research essays that rely heavily on self-directed learning/research, students complete this assessment in a supported, collaborative learning environment that integrates numerous scaffolded learning activities. A key outcome of these activities (which can take numerous forms) is to enhance collegiate discussion, which (1) creates an active and collaborative learning environment, and (2) assists students to develop an argument with clarity and concision. Students complete the majority of their essays during contact hours and are encouraged to choose a topic of interest to them.

PLEASE NOTE: The academic integrity information displayed on this page is currently under review. Some examples and descriptions were developed before the widespread availability of generative AI tools and may not reflect current approaches to assessment security. When adapting an assessment idea, staff should consider how the design supports authorship, verifies student achievement of learning outcomes, and mitigates inappropriate use of AI and other forms of academic misconduct.

Details

CLASS SIZE
40-60
YEAR LEVEL
First year
ASSESSMENT SECURITY
Secure
SUPERVISION STATUS
Supervised – in-person
SUBMISSION MEDIUM
Text
ASSESSMENT DELIVERY MODE
Digital task, Paper-based task
AUTHENTICITY CONTEXT
Reflective / Professional identity, Research‑based / Inquiry / Problem-based
TAGS
essay