Underpinned by an object-centred pedagogy, this assessment requires students to choose an object from a material collection of disciplinary relevance and produce (1) a report and (2) a research essay based on an extended analysis . In the initial report, students may be asked to describe their chosen object, detail any challenges they have encountered during their analysis, and detail further research possibilities. In the research essay, students develop the themes explored in their report, conduct secondary research related to their objects, and reach some significant conclusions regarding their object. Importantly, students must integrate the theoretical frameworks learnt throughout the course into both their report and research essay. Students may also be asked to include reflective elements in these tasks; such as a rationale of why they chose their particular object and what they have learnt through their analysis. The emphasis of this assessment is on a critical engagement with relevant material collections (Such as UQ Anthropology Museum, Queensland Art Gallery, or R.D Milns Antiquities Museum) and the integration of theory and practice in a major practical project . This assessment is coupled with workshop activities that teach students the practical and theoretical knowledge required to conduct their object analysis analysis.

PLEASE NOTE: The academic integrity information displayed on this page is currently under review. Some examples and descriptions were developed before the widespread availability of generative AI tools and may not reflect current approaches to assessment security. When adapting an assessment idea, staff should consider how the design supports authorship, verifies student achievement of learning outcomes, and mitigates inappropriate use of AI and other forms of academic misconduct.